ml2 (Magic Leap Inc)
Structured Review

Ml2, supplied by Magic Leap Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ml2/product/Magic Leap Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Optical See-Through and Video See-Through Head-Mounted Displays for Percutaneous Biopsies: A Comparative Phantom Study"
Article Title: Optical See-Through and Video See-Through Head-Mounted Displays for Percutaneous Biopsies: A Comparative Phantom Study
Journal: Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology
doi: 10.1007/s00270-026-04360-3
Figure Legend Snippet: 2D registration task for the ML2 and AVP. A Model created with blender and rendered on the ML2 and AVP. B Example of the task with the ML2. Each color line represents a different viewing direction. The distance between the lines was measured and plotted in C. C Distance of the different tests with the HMDs, n = 5 participants. Results shown as mean and standard deviation, two-way ANOVA. ML2, Magic Leap 2, AVP, Apple Vision Pro
Techniques Used: Standard Deviation
Figure Legend Snippet: Hologram of the phantom was overlaid on the physical phantom using the HMDs. A View of the phantom. B 3D model used for the ML2 and the AVP. Target lesions used on the study, yellow circle represents Lesion 1 and blue circle represents Lesion 2. C Puncture procedure using the AVP. D View from the AVP during puncture. ML2, Magic Leap 2, AVP, Apple Vision Pro
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Distance of the tip of needle to the center of target lesion for the punctures with and without the HMDs. A Lesion 1. B Lesion 2. Angle offset of the needle to the center of target lesion for the punctures with and without the HMDs. C Lesion 1. D Lesion 2. Data represented as mean and standard deviation and analyzed with a two-way ANOVA. ML2, Magic Leap 2, AVP, Apple Vision Pro
Techniques Used: Standard Deviation
Figure Legend Snippet: Mental and physical load evaluation of the ML2 and AVP. A NASA-TLX scores given by the beginner radiologist after the punctures. B NASA-TLX scores given by the advanced radiologist after the punctures. Data plotted as a Box and Whiskers graph, with 5–95 percentile. Statistical evaluation with a two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ML2, Magic Leap 2, AVP, Apple Vision Pro
Techniques Used: Comparison
